In recent years, the real-time strategy (RTS) genre has seen a resurgence of creativity with a variety of projects aiming to breathe new life into the field. Among these is an intriguing title known as Project Citadel, developed by Last Keep, a small indie studio formed by former talents from BonusXP and Ensemble Studios. This game blends classic strategy elements with modern gaming tropes, such as roguelike mechanics, offering an experience that feels both familiar and refreshingly different. Where many attempts at reviving RTS fall flat, Project Citadel manages to tackle the genre with a unique twist that warrants closer examination.
At its core, Project Citadel introduces players to a conflict against the formidable Voltari empire, with mechanics that encourage different styles of play, including “booming” and “rushing.” While these terms may sound niche, they denote broader strategies in which players either focus on building a strong economy or launch aggressive, early attacks to gain a strategic edge. The introduction of a roguelike format might initially sound risky, but Last Keep’s intention is clear: offering shorter, engaging missions that still hold the potential for strategic depth, while catering to the modern gamer’s busy lifestyle.
Breaking Down the Traditional Format
According to Yohan Sengamalay, one of the driving forces behind Project Citadel, the goal is to “deconstruct” traditional RTS conventions. This philosophy is attractive, especially in a landscape dominated by remakes and sequels. By segmenting elaborate campaigns into bite-sized missions, Sengamalay and his team allow for greater experimentation and immediate rewards. This modern approach to engagement strikes a chord with players who seek quick, intense gameplay experiences without sacrificing the strategic complexity that makes RTS games rewarding.
One significant departure from norms is the game’s focus on squad-based unit control over individual units. This design choice may simplify unit management, an aspect often criticized in traditional RTS titles, while still empowering players to make tactical decisions. The incorporation of skill-based abilities for units also emphasizes the need for precision and timing, enriching the combat experience reminiscent of other successful strategy games like Halo Wars.
Contextualizing Project Citadel in the Genre Landscape
It’s essential to note that the current RTS revival is heavily marked by spiritual successors and nostalgia-driven remakes. As Sengamalay points out, Last Keep’s ambition diverges from opting for safe revenue through reproducing past successes. This ideology reflects a broader trend in gaming, where innovation is often sidestepped in favor of established formulas. While there’s merit in reintroducing classic games, there exists a tangible need for fresh concepts that resonate with contemporary audiences.
That said, the game’s roguelike elements bring forth both promise and possible pitfalls. Over the last few years, the gaming industry has witnessed a wave of roguelike mechanics and gameplay systems merged with various genres, to the point where it’s becoming a bit predictable. There remains a concern that the infusion of roguelike structures could lead to a repetitive gameplay loop that detracts from strategic diversity. Balancing rewarding randomness with coherent mechanics is a challenge that Project Citadel must navigate carefully if it aims to avoid the fate of past projects that faltered due to repetitive structures.
Will History Repeat Itself? Understanding the Risks
Another critical angle to explore is the track record of the developers. Past attempts by key members of Last Keep, like their work on Servo, provide context for potential concerns. Servo initially garnered attention as it sought to innovate within the RTS space through RPG integration but ultimately struggled to deliver a complete product. Such history raises eyebrows regarding whether Project Citadel can rise above its predecessors’ challenges and create a lasting impact.
As an RTS enthusiast, I find myself oscillating between excitement and skepticism. The game’s unique mechanics, commitment to innovation, and the chance to experience engaging, shorter play sessions could signify a step forward for the genre, or it may fall victim to the same pitfalls that have plagued many ambitious titles. Perhaps it’s the thrill of uncertainty that keeps our interest piqued, as the gaming community hopes for something that not only honors RTS traditions but also pushes past their limitations into uncharted territory.
Ultimately, while Project Citadel may face skepticism stemming from its developers’ past endeavors, it also embodies the spirit of experimentation vital for the evolution of the RTS genre. By breaking down the norms and infusing modern gameplay elements, there’s a chance that Last Keep can create a notable entry that resonates with both classic gamers and newcomers alike. As eagerly anticipated releases loom, Project Citadel stands out as an intriguing contender that could redefine real-time strategy for the modern age.
Leave a Reply