Recently, popular Call of Duty streamer Nick “Nickmercs” Kolcheff made a surprising announcement during a livestream on Twitch rival Kick. As part of his reported eight-figure deal with the platform, Kolcheff revealed that he would be running gambling streams. This disclosure has raised questions about the relationship between Kick’s success as a streaming platform and its ties to gambling. Let’s delve deeper into this topic and explore the potential implications.
Initially, it was believed that Kolcheff’s Kick contract included a gambling clause. However, Kick’s head of strategic partnerships clarified that this was not the case. According to gaming and esports reporter Jake Lucky, Kolcheff has a separate Stake contract alongside his Kick deal. Stake.com, a gambling site owned by Kick co-founder Ed Craven, appears to be the platform for Kolcheff’s gambling streams. This raises the question of whether Kick’s success is inherently tied to the success of its gambling arm.
One notable detail shared by Kolcheff is that he has acquired a location outside the United States to conduct his gambling streams. This is due to Stake.com not being licensed to operate in the US. The decision to carry out these streams abroad suggests that Kick’s association with gambling may carry legal implications, reinforcing the idea that Kick’s streaming platform might be heavily reliant on its gambling subsidiary.
Kick.com has demonstrated its willingness to make substantial financial investments to establish itself as a major player in the livestreaming industry. The platform offers an attractive 95/5 subscription revenue split, along with lucrative contracts to well-known streamers such as Féli xQc Lengyel and Kaitlyn “Amouranth” Siragusa. This aggressive strategy highlights the importance of securing popular content creators to attract viewers and bolster Kick’s growth.
It’s worth noting that Stake.com, along with several other gambling sites, was banned from Twitch around a year ago. This decision was largely influenced by concerns raised by prominent Twitch streamers and their viewers regarding gambling addiction and the potential negative impact on Twitch’s predominantly underage audience. Kick’s association with Stake.com could further complicate its standing within the streaming community, as platforms become increasingly cautious about promoting gambling-related content.
Another element that has contributed to Kick’s notoriety is its association with controversial figures. Adin Ross, a streamer known for attracting controversy, calls Kick.com his streaming home. Ross has faced criticism for platforming white supremacists and voicing anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments. The platform also faced backlash earlier this year when a streamer received a one-day ban for streaming explicit content and another streamer filmed a “creepy” encounter with a sex worker using secret cameras. These incidents further highlight the challenges Kick might face in maintaining a positive reputation while dealing with controversial content creators.
The revelation of Nickmercs’ involvement in gambling streams within the context of Kick raises questions about whether the platform’s success is intertwined with its gambling arm. While Kick.com has made significant investments in securing popular streamers and offers attractive revenue splits, its association with gambling and controversial figures poses challenges. As the streaming landscape evolves, platforms will need to carefully navigate these issues to maintain credibility and appeal to both content creators and audiences alike.
Leave a Reply