Roger Clark, known for his portrayal of Arthur Morgan in Red Dead Redemption 2, recently expressed his personal preference for the game’s “canon ending.” Despite the existence of four different endings for Arthur, Clark believes that the high Honor version of going back to help John is the most fitting conclusion for the protagonist’s story.
In a recent interview, Clark discussed the various endings available to Arthur in the game. He highlighted the high and low Honor options for both helping John and going back for the money. Clark expressed his belief that going back for the money holds little significance for Arthur, as his days are numbered and money would not benefit him in his final moments. Therefore, he feels that aiding John with high Honor is the most suitable ending for Arthur’s character.
While Clark’s choice aligns with many fans’ perception of the canon ending, there is still debate surrounding the different conclusions for Arthur. Some argue that going back for the money could indirectly benefit John or be used to help others in need. Despite Clark’s stance against this option, the moral ambiguity of Arthur’s decisions continues to be a topic of discussion among players.
When asked about potential features or gameplay ideas for future Red Dead games, Clark suggested the ability to choose between being a lawman or an outlaw. His preference for high Honor endings in Red Dead Redemption 2 reflects his desire for players to have more agency in defining their character’s moral compass and gameplay style.
Roger Clark’s perspective on the canon ending for Red Dead Redemption 2 sheds light on the complexities of Arthur Morgan’s journey. While some may disagree with his interpretation, Clark’s insight into the character’s motivations adds depth to the narrative of the game. As fans continue to revisit Arthur’s story, the debate over the “true” ending will undoubtedly persist, further enhancing the legacy of Red Dead Redemption 2 in the gaming community.
Leave a Reply